<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Top Ten</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kilroyjames.co.uk/2008/05/the-google-top-ten/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kilroyjames.co.uk/2008/05/the-google-top-ten/</link>
	<description>Somerset specialists in web design, web and internet marketing, seo and ecommerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:48:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kilroy</title>
		<link>http://www.kilroyjames.co.uk/2008/05/the-google-top-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kilroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilroyjames.co.uk/?p=47#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Hi Spencer, thanks for the compliment but sorry you cannot copy or reproduce the articles on this site. You can link to them though, use a trackback or pingback, which is normal practice for blogs. I see you use wordpress too so it should be a cinch.
Thanks, John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Spencer, thanks for the compliment but sorry you cannot copy or reproduce the articles on this site. You can link to them though, use a trackback or pingback, which is normal practice for blogs. I see you use wordpress too so it should be a cinch.<br />
Thanks, John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.kilroyjames.co.uk/2008/05/the-google-top-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilroyjames.co.uk/?p=47#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Really cool stuff la, can I copy your article for my blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really cool stuff la, can I copy your article for my blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kilroy</title>
		<link>http://www.kilroyjames.co.uk/2008/05/the-google-top-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kilroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilroyjames.co.uk/?p=47#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dustin.
Google doesn&#039;t judge, indeed doesn&#039;t know, whether you&#039;ve paid someone to do your web marketing for you or not. And I would say you are doing the right thing by getting professionals to do it for you &#8211; Google certainly won&#039;t &#039;mind&#039;.

However, Google can spot, doesn&#039;t like and will &#039;object&#039; to webpages that try unfairly, by using so-called Black Hat (aka unethical or spamdexing) techniques to get an unreasonably high position in its search results. No reputable company will use these techniques, and anyway I believe they have quite low &#039;survival value&#039; (which is the subject of an upcoming article).

If you are worried your Web Marketing company might be using unethical SEO techniques, which could put your site&#039;s listing in peril, simply ask them to confirm in an email that the methods they are employing are Google approved White Hat techniques. This way you have recourse if the worst occurs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dustin.<br />
Google doesn&#8217;t judge, indeed doesn&#8217;t know, whether you&#8217;ve paid someone to do your web marketing for you or not. And I would say you are doing the right thing by getting professionals to do it for you &ndash; Google certainly won&#8217;t &#8216;mind&#8217;.</p>
<p>However, Google can spot, doesn&#8217;t like and will &#8216;object&#8217; to webpages that try unfairly, by using so-called Black Hat (aka unethical or spamdexing) techniques to get an unreasonably high position in its search results. No reputable company will use these techniques, and anyway I believe they have quite low &#8216;survival value&#8217; (which is the subject of an upcoming article).</p>
<p>If you are worried your Web Marketing company might be using unethical SEO techniques, which could put your site&#8217;s listing in peril, simply ask them to confirm in an email that the methods they are employing are Google approved White Hat techniques. This way you have recourse if the worst occurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustin blake</title>
		<link>http://www.kilroyjames.co.uk/2008/05/the-google-top-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>dustin blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kilroyjames.co.uk/?p=47#comment-11</guid>
		<description>awesome article...is it true that google doesn&#039;t like paid lists? I.e I pay partypop and the get me on google page 1 organic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome article&#8230;is it true that google doesn&#8217;t like paid lists? I.e I pay partypop and the get me on google page 1 organic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

